Hooked on Likes: An intervention

by Dan Goodswen in News Google+

Marketing magazine recently published an article from me on how to think outside the Like box. They’ve been kind enough to let us reproduce it in full below:

In the movie Jerry Maguire, Tom Cruise has an epiphany. He writes it down. The gist is this: less is more.

He stays up all night working on his mission statement, and when he’s finished, he sends everyone a copy.

They fire him.

When the world is convinced that more is more, trying to convince people to do less is a difficult task. But that’s exactly what I’m about to do. Here goes.

Facebook has us hooked on Likes. We’re addicts. We collect them fanatically, often at great cost. We compulsively check to make sure competitors don’t have more than us.

And it doesn’t end there. We want our Likers to Like everything we post. So we tell them to ‘Like this’, because if we don’t they might not, and if we’re not being Liked then we can’t justify our budgets and – golly gosh – the whole social economy we built might come tumbling down.

But the problem isn’t that we don’t have enough Likes. The problem is that we’re measuring the wrong things.

Take the prompted engagement for example. The prompted engagement is a Facebook-wide pandemic; it’s a virus infecting the content of thousands of brands. You’ve seen these posts. Some of you have posted one: ‘Like this if you X’, or ‘Comment if you Y’.

This isn’t a new tactic in social – just ask the Twitter and Tumblr users who were getting asked to ‘RT if you love Bieber’ and ‘Reblog if you have a head’ years ago.

The prompted engagement isn’t new to Facebook, either. But what was once a quirky engagement tactic used by a handful of brands has now reached such a level of saturation that it’s both difficult to ignore and impossible to escape.

These days when a brand asks me to ‘Like this post’ I unlike them.

How’s that for cut through?

Maybe if we all did the same brands would stop doing it.

A post where you have to ask for engagement is like a cold call. Yes the person picked up the phone, but they didn’t want to talk to you.

You got your engagement, ticked off the KPI, scored well against your competitors, but is that going to help your business? I doubt it. Probably the opposite.

It’s disingenuous. Cheap.

You’re better than that.

Social is not a cold call. It isn’t about meaningless KPIs and empty metrics. It’s about conversations. It’s about brand management and customer value.

A Like doesn’t represent your power as a brand. A prompted engagement doesn’t represent success. Real, meaningful conversations do. And you can’t buy a conversation with anyone worth conversing with (ask a telemarketer).

With a good strategy, 10,000 highly-engaged fans will provide more value than 100,000 indifferent ones.

The trick is, as I said in my previous blog post, to offer valuable content. Hire great people to make your content. Then if you absolutely have to spend money, use it to promote that outstanding content.

Case in point: General Motors. In May, GM pulled $10 million out of Facebook. ‘The ads don’t work,’ they said.

Facebook told GM to try putting that money into community management. ‘Create good content,’ they replied, ‘give people a reason to talk to you.’

The addiction to Likes has made marketers so focused on growing their communities that growth is taking presidence over nourishment. If things stay like this, we’ll be left with a starving mass of under-fed communities producing anaemic engagement.

Don’t be afraid of fewer Likes. A smaller, content-focused community is more likely to attract actual customers, or those who would like to be. Prize pigs need not apply.

Also, don’t be afraid to measure yourself differently. Measure referrals, for example, not engagements. Measure sentiment. Pay attention to comments. Talk to your fans.

Less can be more in social. Fewer ads, more valuable content. Fewer fans, more valuable engagement. Don’t worry about what your competitors are doing. Focus on what your community wants and deliver that.

Back to Jerry Maguire. In a famous scene at the end of act two, Tom Cruise begs his only remaining client, Cuba Gooding Jr. to “help me help you”.

You can help social help you by changing your thinking.

Spend your time and money creating great content, not on telling your fans what to like.

Ultimately, if you’re listening, they’ll tell you.

If you liked this post, why not subscribe to We Are Social by or ?


  • Paul Gage

    like

  • Jordan @netnatives

    I wonder what Wildfire would say about this? Great article though. Strong opinions are always welcome with us! 

  • mrseanmeehan

    Love this Dan, are WeAreSocial going to fire you now?! :)
     

  • http://www.antonkoekemoer.com/ Anton Koekemoer

    Hi Dan,

    Yes – I tend to agree with you and cruise – Lesser is more , especially if the quality
    and authority of the likes is better. As Facebook recently started devaluing
    likes etc. that seems illegitimate. No more buying likes for the people in grey
    and black hats… (hooray!)

  • Jordan @netnatives

    It seems though – looking at your own Facebook page. You guys could take a leaf out of your own book? With over 38,000 likes but only a couple of people engaging on each post… something is going wrong for you guys here > https://www.facebook.com/wearesocial?fref=ts

  • http://twitter.com/tobeconfirmed Ramzi Yakob

    Dan – I completely agree with you. One question. Where is ‘the line’ with regards to prompted engagement. For example, at the bottom of this very blog post, you prompt people with this:

    “If you like this post, why not subscribe to We Are Social by e-mail or RSS?”

    Based on this. Is your blog post basically saying that how you phrase your prompted engagement is important, rather than all prompted engagement being bad? I’m curious because, at face value, it looks like the WeAreSocial blog post template directly contradicts the content of the post.

  • http://wearesocial.net/ Robin Grant

     Hey Ramzi

    Just to let you know Dan is on holiday now for a couple of weeks. I’m sure he’ll relish replying when he gets back… ;)

  • http://twitter.com/tobeconfirmed Ramzi Yakob

    Awesome sauce. I reckon it isn’t always black & white – will be good to know where Dan reckons the safe grey area is though :o )

  • Davidrusonline

    Agree with all of that, lets take the one tangible measure of social marketing away and leave things like “social ROI” and “social brand engagement” then no one will be able to judge us!

  • Dave Allan

    The  real problem now is even with quality content FB restricts the amount of people who see a particular update. Anecdotally, less than 2 per cent of fans are seeing a update.

    Also people tend to forget that the ‘share’ is the most important metric as this almost guarantees the update goes into their friend’s newsfeed whereas a ‘like’ does not.

    This article is right in the sense brands should not be focussing on ‘likes’ but even quality content is not guaranteed to be spread and read because so few users ever get to see an update -no mateer how good it is.

  • http://wearesocial.com.au/ Dan Goodswen

    Thankfully not! :)

  • http://wearesocial.com.au/ Dan Goodswen

    Hey Ramzi, two things;

    1) That line is hard coded into the website – you’ll find it at the bottom of all our posts. Sensibly, I don’t get access to the site code. That would not end well…
     2) A call to action at the end of a valuable piece of content is not the same as a prompted engagement, certainly not in the way it’s outlined in this article. As I’ve talked about in the past, providing value and relevance to the audience is job number one. I believe this post achieved that. Now that you’ve read and enjoyed the content, asking you subscribe to the RSS for more updates is a perfectly acceptable prompt, and certainly it is nowhere near as disingenuous as asking readers to ‘Like this if you love cats’. 

    You also need to take into consideration the format of this post; a long form blog. The unwritten rules regarding calls to action aren’t the same as a post on Facebook for example. 

    There is more scope in a blog to post a call to action, in much the same way as a newspaper or radio station would by asking their audience to write or call in with an opinion on a story. 

    When I post a link to this article on Facebook, where users haven’t had chance to read the post yet, I certainly wouldn’t be asking them to subscribe to our RSS feed, the same way I won’t be asking for a like, comment or share in a Facebook post. 

    The line is this; providing value gives you some scope to prompt. Not a lot of scope. Some. Don’t ask people to subscribe and like and comment and share. Pick one. But if you haven’t provided anything, then don’t prompt.

    Prompt others as you’d wish to be prompted.

    Hope that clears things up :)