The value of relevant social content

by Dan Goodswen in News Google+

Marketing magazine recently published an article from me on the value of relevant social content. They’ve been kind enough to let us reproduce it in full below:

like this post

In traditional media there is an old phrase you may have heard: ‘If it bleeds, it leads.’

Tabloids, television news and even broadsheets know that if they post a story involving death, gore and general maiming, then they’re going to sell more copies or retain more viewers.

The values of the brand get thrown under a bus in exchange for higher ratings.

Social media, it seems, isn’t immune to this kind of selling out, though it is of a far less macabre, far more furry variety, one that deserves it’s own adage. It goes a little something like this:

‘If it’s a cat, post that.’

Everyone loves a Lolcat. Or dog. Or sloth. There are any number of cute creatures that will make the internet weak with joy at the very mention. I’m not disputing the power of ‘awww’. What I am disputing is their place in your content schedule.

Let me put this as clearly as possible: if your brand isn’t involved with cats, if it doesn’t sell cat food, or find homes for rescued cats or provide any number of other cat-based services, then you have no business posting cat pictures on your brand page.

I know they’re good for engagement. I know people like them. But there are websites for that. There are dedicated Facebook pages. Yours is not one of them.

Good social content has two very important ingredients: value, and relevance.

If you can create content that is valuable to your fans, relevant to your brand and your fans’ interests – and you can present it in a compelling way – then you will have a highly engaged, highly active community.

Pander to cat meme culture and sure you might get a few likes, you may even get a few shares, but what you won’t get is affinity. You won’t create community.

Think about why your fans are your fans. A 2011 study showed that 58% of your Facebook fans clicked Like because they are already a customer.

These are people who already buy into what you do. They want to connect with your brand. They want value. They can get cat pictures from their friends – what they want from you is insight, expertise, information and inspiration.

And why do you want to provide it? Because the same study showed that 56% of fans are more likely to recommend your brand after becoming a fan. Your raison d’etre should be to give them the tools to do that.

Give them great, informative, sharable content. Provide tips, tricks and hacks within your field of expertise. Make them fun, visual and engaging.

Facebook is not an experiment. Twitter is not a test. You can’t just ‘dip a toe in the water’ and expect not to lose a leg. If you don’t have a solid content strategy, you need one. And fast.

Think of it this way: your Facebook page is a magazine. Have a serious look at the posts on your Timeline. Is that a magazine that is relevant to your industry? Is that a magazine you’d read?

If the answer is no, find someone who knows how to optimise content for social media.

The value of relevant social content is conversation, and the value of conversation is return on investment.

For the sake of a few likes on a cat picture, is that a value you can afford to miss?

If you liked this post, why not subscribe to We Are Social by or ?


  • Douglas Cook

    Good article! Of course it’s got to be relevant however I would question the definition of relevance here. To say only post a cat if you are involved in cats, assumes that you’re marketing has never progressed beyond the point of communicating your basic functional product benefits. If you want to use social to bring across a more emotional benefit and a cat does that, then why not post a cat?

    Take probably the most prolific cats out there, a brand that produces a delicious fruit drink, I don’t know much about the detail of their strategy but I’d guess that irreverent sense of humour is somewhere in their brand DNA and something they believe differentiates them from the rest. So while they spend a lot of money in promoting the wholesome nature of their drinks in print, pack etc. they have clearly decided that social is the place to drive their point of difference in their irreverent humour, and if a cat is the most hilarious way of doing it on occasion, then why not?

    Selling Cider as I do, it’s unlikely I’d ever brief a TV ad telling the agency to show only apples, cider and people drinking it, I’d be briefing them on something a little more emotional and do the functional piece elsewhere. Personally I believe social is probably best used to do this same emotional side so I can entirely see why for some brands a cat may, on occasion, be the best thing for them to post!

    This is by the way a slightly more thought out version of what was in my head at #smwfmcg on Tuesday morning!

  • http://wearesocial.com.au/ Dan Goodswen

    Hi Douglas, I understand your point, but question how irreverent a cat post can be when cat posts are so ubiquitous?

    There is no one-size fits all solution in social, and the above article is just my take – but if the goal is to cut through the noise while being relevant to your brand, then why risk appearing lazy and pandering to cliche by posting content that your fans can find from any number of other sources?

    If the goal is to cut through, then you need to be heard, and in my opinion developing a unique voice will help you do that. Whether that voice services the brand functionally, emotionally, or a little of both, it won’t be heard by shouting the same thing as everyone else.

    Again, just my take. Thanks you sharing your thoughts.

  • Douglas Cook

    My comment was more a counter to the point that if you don’t sell something don’t show it, which is how I read the article, not just as a rally against cats. If your point is just don’t show cats, I kinda agree, if it’s a general point about what makes relevant content and that if your brand isn’t involved with X, if it doesn’t sell X food, or find homes for rescued X’s or provide any number of other X-based services, then you have no business posting X pictures on your brand page, in that case I disagree, if picture of X might bring across other values of your brand, even if it’s not part of your product itself.  You illustrated that using cats so I ran with that example but could have equally gone with dogs, sloths, whatever else.

    Too many cats.

  • Pingback: The Social 7 - Selling Doors On Facebook & Timeline for Teaching History | Spiderworking.com's Social Networking blog

  • Pingback: 3 – Based on random story