Hello, we are social. We’re a global conversation agency, with offices in London, New York, Paris, Milan, Munich, Singapore, Sydney & São Paulo. We help brands to listen, understand and engage in conversations in social media.
We’re a new kind of agency, but conversations between people are nothing new. Neither is the idea that ‘markets are conversations’.
We’re already helping adidas, Heinz, Unilever, Heineken, Tesco, Orange, Eurostar, Kleenex & Hotels.com.
If you’d like to chat about us helping you too, then give us a call on +44 20 3195 1700 or drop us an email.
Luke Brynley-Jones is the co-founder of Influence People, which runs social media conferences in the UK, Europe and USA. They’re hosting Social PR 2011 in London next Monday, 28th February.
If you joined the rest of the world in cringing at the Domino’s Pizza social media PR disaster a couple of years back – Taco Bell seems to be pointing the way for large corporations in dealing with negative online buzz.
The company has come under fire for selling beef that’s only 88% beef. Now personally, I never imagine anything we eat in fast food chains is real food, but maybe I’m a cynic. In any event the company has come out fighting with a YouTube video from it’s President, plus positive posts on it’s Facebook and Twitter pages. Mashable reports that this has had negligible effects on the bad press they’re getting – but then, Mashable mentions Taco Bell’s “45k Twitter followers”, and this morning they’ve got 80k – so they look to have signed up an extra 35,000 followers in the past few weeks. Clearly, someone’s supporting them.
The key thing is – they’re making their case heard. The very fact that Mashable has publicised their CEO’s explanation means that half the blogosphere now knows there are two sides to this story. I suspect we’ll see a mellowing of criticism as the story evens up and people realise (if they didn’t already know) that “meat” isn’t always 100% meat. And guess what? A few million more people will know about Taco Bell. In a business in which familiarity with the brand is half the battle, that’s a tidy upside to a bad hair day.
Looking back to the Toyota recall disaster in 2009/10, which many excitable people thought could be the end for the Japanese car giant, some reports showed that their active response to the problem via social media actually led to a bounce in interest from buyers. Simply by engaging – albeit against a tide of negative sentiment – they raised the profile of their vehicles and reminded buyers of their, usually, very high standards. These people didn’t have a death wish. They were simply responding positively to the question subliminally posed by negative media press “Do you really want to buy a Toyota car?”
P.T Barnum once provided a famous insight about all publicity being good publicity – and I guess there’s no reason why social media shouldn’t form part of that adage.
Luke has kindly offered We Are Social readers a 10% discount on the Social PR 2011 ticket price, by entering the discount code “wearesocial” when buying a ticket directly from their website.
If you liked this post, why not subscribe to We Are Social by email or RSS?
George M. Cohan said “I don’t care what you say about me, as long as you say something about me, and as long as you spell my name right”, but probably there is difference between to be known and to be well-known.
I think ethics are the future of social media communication: the responsible sharing of contents that could be useful to people
Anonymous
Hayes Thompson – you’re right ahead of me.
The same issues apply to old-school PR in the new media world but the tactics, the effects, the channels – it’s all changed. Honesty still seems to be a winning formula.
http://www.digitalprescriptions.co.uk/ Jordan Stone
In the last 24hrs PHD seem to have turned things around in their approach. Though they did initially delete some comments on YouTube – it should be said, many of which were abusive and profane – they’ve apologised and have been trying to deal with the criticisms in an fairly open and transparent manner ever since. They’ve done so on YouTube and Twitter, and have even gone so far as to set up http://phdworldwide.posterous.com to handle the debate. The video wasn’t my cup of tea, but all things considered they appear to be handling things reasonably well.
http://www.oursocialtimes.com/ Luke Brynley-Jones
Well – it’s a chilling video and deservedly panned. But as Jordan points out below, they’ve issued their mea culpa (as Taco Bell did) and generated a hell of a lot of awareness. I bet they do well out of it – in the end.
http://carolweinfeld.com/ Carol L. Weinfeld
Agreed. It’s important to respond to consumers, to continue the conversation and relationship.
ambermatthews: Karmic? RT @DanielMclaren: Hodgson names his first England team the day Dalglish is sacked by Liverpool. How fortunes change in 18 months! 3 hours ago
JaswinderVirdee: Another one of those days where the hamster in your brain won't stop running around so you won't get to sleep till 6 am... 4 hours ago
Pingback: Kan man vända negativ publicitet till något positivt : Mathias Bilenberg – råpublicerad