<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communication vs. engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eda2day</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>eda2day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=4302#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>All this argument about engagement vs. communication sounds a bit contrived.  If you&#039;re trying to convey the message the one to one relating without an agenda is more genuine and rare, then say so.  It is what it is: relating one to one.  As the t-shirt advises: more wag. less bark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this argument about engagement vs. communication sounds a bit contrived.  If you&#39;re trying to convey the message the one to one relating without an agenda is more genuine and rare, then say so.  It is what it is: relating one to one.  As the t-shirt advises: more wag. less bark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eda2day</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1840</link>
		<dc:creator>eda2day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=4302#comment-1840</guid>
		<description>All this argument about engagement vs. communication sounds a bit contrived.  If you&#039;re trying to convey the message the one to one relating without an agenda is more genuine and rare, then say so.  It is what it is: relating one to one.  As the t-shirt advises: more wag. less bark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this argument about engagement vs. communication sounds a bit contrived.  If you&#39;re trying to convey the message the one to one relating without an agenda is more genuine and rare, then say so.  It is what it is: relating one to one.  As the t-shirt advises: more wag. less bark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlottebeckett</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>charlottebeckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=4302#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Just had a meeting discussing this topic! My take was that this is the argument for evaluating what you want to do before you select the tools (if I have another call asking for a page on Facebook...).  Comms and engagement are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes we can pull people into our worlds, sometimes we need to go to them  - and doing both might be the most fruitful approach.  Still, saying that, it made for a good headline on the original blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had a meeting discussing this topic! My take was that this is the argument for evaluating what you want to do before you select the tools (if I have another call asking for a page on Facebook&#8230;).  Comms and engagement are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes we can pull people into our worlds, sometimes we need to go to them  &#8211; and doing both might be the most fruitful approach.  Still, saying that, it made for a good headline on the original blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/02/communication-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=4302#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>hear hear - a comms strategy is definitely different to an engagement strategy - though you dont just need to go out to the communities and groups - I think it is possible over time (and with effort) to build that engagement in a group or location that you manage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hear hear &#8211; a comms strategy is definitely different to an engagement strategy &#8211; though you dont just need to go out to the communities and groups &#8211; I think it is possible over time (and with effort) to build that engagement in a group or location that you manage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
