<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MyDavidCameron: an analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jump analysis</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>jump analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>MyDavidCameron: an analysis is good...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MyDavidCameron: an analysis is good&#8230;</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engaging the progressive grass-roots in the UK &#124; AlexWhite.org</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Engaging the progressive grass-roots in the UK &#124; AlexWhite.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>[...] a more detailed analysis, there&#8217;s a good article by WeAreSocial &#8211; a social media strategy company in the UK &#8211; who&#8217;ve written about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a more detailed analysis, there&#8217;s a good article by WeAreSocial &#8211; a social media strategy company in the UK &#8211; who&#8217;ve written about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>My david cameron have said they wont be satirising the next tory poster, knowing its had its day. Still, this hasnt the tories from making their own p-poor fake poster sites. What will be next? The posters have already been turned into a 3d game (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalgaming.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.politicalgaming.com&lt;/a&gt;) and other copy sites are springing up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My david cameron have said they wont be satirising the next tory poster, knowing its had its day. Still, this hasnt the tories from making their own p-poor fake poster sites. What will be next? The posters have already been turned into a 3d game (<a href="http://www.politicalgaming.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.politicalgaming.com</a>) and other copy sites are springing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>My david cameron have said they wont be satirising the next tory poster, knowing its had its day. Still, this hasnt the tories from making their own p-poor fake poster sites. What will be next? The posters have already been turned into a 3d game (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalgaming.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.politicalgaming.com&lt;/a&gt;) and other copy sites are springing up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My david cameron have said they wont be satirising the next tory poster, knowing its had its day. Still, this hasnt the tories from making their own p-poor fake poster sites. What will be next? The posters have already been turned into a 3d game (<a href="http://www.politicalgaming.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.politicalgaming.com</a>) and other copy sites are springing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotten from the top down &#124; qwghlm.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotten from the top down &#124; qwghlm.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>[...] was picked up by left-wing bloggers and some of the spoofs were by Labour supporters, but for once the Labour party never attempted to own or control it officially. Inevitably, however, was the reframing by Conservative supporters as a Labour-backed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was picked up by left-wing bloggers and some of the spoofs were by Labour supporters, but for once the Labour party never attempted to own or control it officially. Inevitably, however, was the reframing by Conservative supporters as a Labour-backed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simoncollister</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>simoncollister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex. Off the top of my head I can&#039;t think of any immediately. However, I would caution that NGOs &#039;creating&#039; or &#039;launching&#039; a crowdsoucred campaign need to be careful. Forcing participation doesn&#039;t guarantee quality or quantity of materials. I&#039;ll get back to you if I can think of any examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex. Off the top of my head I can&#39;t think of any immediately. However, I would caution that NGOs &#39;creating&#39; or &#39;launching&#39; a crowdsoucred campaign need to be careful. Forcing participation doesn&#39;t guarantee quality or quantity of materials. I&#39;ll get back to you if I can think of any examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilks</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Interesting piece (though there&#039;s a danger of over-analysing this new site).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you know of any NGOs/campaign organisations that have used a crowd-sourcing approach similar to mydavidcameron to generate new posters/visuals/messages and to engage their supporters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting piece (though there&#39;s a danger of over-analysing this new site).</p>
<p>Do you know of any NGOs/campaign organisations that have used a crowd-sourcing approach similar to mydavidcameron to generate new posters/visuals/messages and to engage their supporters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simoncollister</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>simoncollister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Hey Clifford. Thanks for the comment. I take your point re. Pro-labour vs Anti-Tory. and agree - but I;d still suggest that it&#039;s from this angle that Labour are trying to re-orient the network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re-programming sounds a bit too dramatic maybe. By that I mean re-programming the general discourse/debate from anti-government back towards anti-Tory and giving others (like LibDems, Greens, etc) the chance to join up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Clifford. Thanks for the comment. I take your point re. Pro-labour vs Anti-Tory. and agree &#8211; but I;d still suggest that it&#39;s from this angle that Labour are trying to re-orient the network.</p>
<p>Re-programming sounds a bit too dramatic maybe. By that I mean re-programming the general discourse/debate from anti-government back towards anti-Tory and giving others (like LibDems, Greens, etc) the chance to join up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford Singer</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mydavidcameron-some-post-event-analyses/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3862#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>Simon, many thanks for this sharp and thoughtful analysis - and you are quite right about Labour&#039;s mistake in trying to co-opt #Welovethenhs&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;d quibble with the last part:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Therefore, Labour trying to reprogram the goal of the networks driving the MyDavidCameron campaign to be pro-Labour is actually a smart move.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Partly because the networks are so amorphous I&#039;m not sure that anyone is in a position to &quot;reprogram&quot; them. (And they also include a fair number of Lib Dems, Greens, etc.) Arguably a website like ours would fit better with an anti-Tory tactical voting campaign, although unlike 1997 none really exists this time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But also because the website is essentially about satire - which is intrinsically negative - and so difficult to turn into pro-anything (we touch on this issue a little on our About Us page: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mydavidcameron.com/about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mydavidcameron.com/about.html&lt;/a&gt; - but it&#039;s definitely something for further debate).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, many thanks for this sharp and thoughtful analysis &#8211; and you are quite right about Labour&#39;s mistake in trying to co-opt #Welovethenhs</p>
<p>But I&#39;d quibble with the last part:</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore, Labour trying to reprogram the goal of the networks driving the MyDavidCameron campaign to be pro-Labour is actually a smart move.&#8221;</p>
<p>Partly because the networks are so amorphous I&#39;m not sure that anyone is in a position to &#8220;reprogram&#8221; them. (And they also include a fair number of Lib Dems, Greens, etc.) Arguably a website like ours would fit better with an anti-Tory tactical voting campaign, although unlike 1997 none really exists this time.</p>
<p>But also because the website is essentially about satire &#8211; which is intrinsically negative &#8211; and so difficult to turn into pro-anything (we touch on this issue a little on our About Us page: <a href="http://mydavidcameron.com/about.html" rel="nofollow">http://mydavidcameron.com/about.html</a> &#8211; but it&#39;s definitely something for further debate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

