<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A mildly popular blog’s stats laid bare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The best of the We Are Social blog, 2010 / we are social</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-3468</link>
		<dc:creator>The best of the We Are Social blog, 2010 / we are social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-3468</guid>
		<description>[...] A mildly popular blog’s stats laid bare We kicked off the year with a in-depth analysis of We Are Social&#8217;s 2009 stats, looking at our sources of traffic, how RSS contributed to the mix and what effect social media was having. There&#8217;s a lot covered in this post &#8211; whether you&#8217;re interested in web analytics or you&#8217;ve never given them a second thought, this is a recommended read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A mildly popular blog’s stats laid bare We kicked off the year with a in-depth analysis of We Are Social&#8217;s 2009 stats, looking at our sources of traffic, how RSS contributed to the mix and what effect social media was having. There&#8217;s a lot covered in this post &#8211; whether you&#8217;re interested in web analytics or you&#8217;ve never given them a second thought, this is a recommended read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustGiving for charities: Social media strategy advice on the AskCharity blog</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>JustGiving for charities: Social media strategy advice on the AskCharity blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>[...] numbers are your thing, ‘conversation agency’ We Are Social shared all the 2009 stats for their blog and linked social media sites recently. It’s a long read, but a very interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] numbers are your thing, ‘conversation agency’ We Are Social shared all the 2009 stats for their blog and linked social media sites recently. It’s a long read, but a very interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social bookmarking service</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>social bookmarking service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>Thanks for giving the information.&lt;br&gt;very useful information.&lt;br&gt;keep going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for giving the information.<br />very useful information.<br />keep going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planner Reads &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A mildly popular blog’s stats laid bare</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Planner Reads &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A mildly popular blog’s stats laid bare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>[...] more interested in generally applicable insights, you might want to skip ahead to the sections on other engagement measures and distribution factors, 2009’s most popular We Are Social posts, traffic sources, RSS/email subscribers, Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more interested in generally applicable insights, you might want to skip ahead to the sections on other engagement measures and distribution factors, 2009’s most popular We Are Social posts, traffic sources, RSS/email subscribers, Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander White</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>I guess I was pointing out the traffic sources to the websites (for Campaign Monitor and ShareThis). Since you don&#039;t have an email newsletter, I suppose the comparison is not easy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was pointing out the traffic sources to the websites (for Campaign Monitor and ShareThis). Since you don&#39;t have an email newsletter, I suppose the comparison is not easy.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Grant</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>Hey Alexander - I&#039;m sure sure I&#039;d claim I&#039;m an &#039;authority&#039; - I&#039;m just honestly reporting our stats as I found them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not sure you&#039;re comparing like for like - Campaign Monitor were mostly looking at the results they were getting from their email newsletter (which we don&#039;t have - although people can subscribe to We Are Social&#039;s RSS feed by email using Feedburner, this is not an email newsletter in the same sense as Campaign Monitor&#039;s).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And ShareThis are looking at how content is shared using thier service accoss all of the blogs where it&#039;s in use, which is very different again. The vast majority of people sharing We Are Social&#039;s content do so either spontaneously themselves or as retweets - not using the Tweet or Share buttons at the bottom of each of our posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alexander &#8211; I&#39;m sure sure I&#39;d claim I&#39;m an &#39;authority&#39; &#8211; I&#39;m just honestly reporting our stats as I found them.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not sure you&#39;re comparing like for like &#8211; Campaign Monitor were mostly looking at the results they were getting from their email newsletter (which we don&#39;t have &#8211; although people can subscribe to We Are Social&#39;s RSS feed by email using Feedburner, this is not an email newsletter in the same sense as Campaign Monitor&#39;s).</p>
<p>And ShareThis are looking at how content is shared using thier service accoss all of the blogs where it&#39;s in use, which is very different again. The vast majority of people sharing We Are Social&#39;s content do so either spontaneously themselves or as retweets &#8211; not using the Tweet or Share buttons at the bottom of each of our posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander White</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>I too was interested - mainly about the source of traffic. I&#039;m interested in why your stats would differ so markedly from what other &quot;authorities&quot; suggest, such as Campaign Monitor (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/2981/measuring-up-email-and-social-media/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/2981/m...&lt;/a&gt;) or ShareThis (&lt;a href=&quot;http://sharethis.com/blog/2009/12/16/the-value-of-sharing-social-engagement/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sharethis.com/blog/2009/12/16/the-value-...&lt;/a&gt;). Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was interested &#8211; mainly about the source of traffic. I&#39;m interested in why your stats would differ so markedly from what other &#8220;authorities&#8221; suggest, such as Campaign Monitor (<a href="http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/2981/measuring-up-email-and-social-media/" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/2981/m&#8230;</a>) or ShareThis (<a href="http://sharethis.com/blog/2009/12/16/the-value-of-sharing-social-engagement/" rel="nofollow">http://sharethis.com/blog/2009/12/16/the-value-&#8230;</a>). Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie osmond</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie osmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin,&lt;br&gt;Great post. Very interesting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It strikes me that this post is also a good case study into the question of social media and company secrecy. I meet many clients who are nervous about social media because they may let out information that&#039;s valuable to competitors. And I imagine you have similar discussions with your clients. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So here you are, bearing all and here I am (a competitor-ish) checking it out. I thought you might be interested to hear how that felt!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I saw the post I was delighted - &quot;here comes some great competitor intel&quot; I thought. It was fascinating to read your numbers and then to compare them to ours. It was also really interesting to gauge how you were measuring success and most importantly, what things were successful for you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the more I read (and the more I compared) the more I realised that beyond satisfying my curiosity, there was surprinsgly little for me, as a competitor, to gain from this. Your experiences are similar to our own (25:35:30:10 with Twitter the big driver of social traffic). And thinking about it, this is not that surprising. If two firms are doing similar stuff, it only bears to reason that the results might be similar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in fact the biggest takeaway for me was &quot;this is a great blog post. I am annoyed we didn&#039;t get there first. It&#039;s powerful search engine fodder and an impressive bit of practicing what you preach.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I think you&#039;ve shown it&#039;s possible to give out what appears to be valuable, sensitive information without handing a leg-up to competitors. How wonderfully social. Well done&lt;br&gt;Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin,<br />Great post. Very interesting. </p>
<p>It strikes me that this post is also a good case study into the question of social media and company secrecy. I meet many clients who are nervous about social media because they may let out information that&#39;s valuable to competitors. And I imagine you have similar discussions with your clients. </p>
<p>So here you are, bearing all and here I am (a competitor-ish) checking it out. I thought you might be interested to hear how that felt!</p>
<p>When I saw the post I was delighted &#8211; &#8220;here comes some great competitor intel&#8221; I thought. It was fascinating to read your numbers and then to compare them to ours. It was also really interesting to gauge how you were measuring success and most importantly, what things were successful for you. </p>
<p>But the more I read (and the more I compared) the more I realised that beyond satisfying my curiosity, there was surprinsgly little for me, as a competitor, to gain from this. Your experiences are similar to our own (25:35:30:10 with Twitter the big driver of social traffic). And thinking about it, this is not that surprising. If two firms are doing similar stuff, it only bears to reason that the results might be similar.</p>
<p>So in fact the biggest takeaway for me was &#8220;this is a great blog post. I am annoyed we didn&#39;t get there first. It&#39;s powerful search engine fodder and an impressive bit of practicing what you preach.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I think you&#39;ve shown it&#39;s possible to give out what appears to be valuable, sensitive information without handing a leg-up to competitors. How wonderfully social. Well done<br />Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madisonpatel</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2010/01/mildly-popular-blogs-stats-laid-bare/comment-page-1/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonpatel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=3829#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>Hi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    My name is Freya Smith. I&#039;ve just visited your website &lt;br&gt;    and I was wondering if you&#039;d be interested in&lt;br&gt;    exchanging links with my website. I can offer you a HOME PAGE link back&lt;br&gt;    from  2 of my Online Business Guide website wich are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.colinmason.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.colinmason.com/&lt;/a&gt; with page rank 4&lt;br&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://planshabitatservices.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://planshabitatservices.com/&lt;/a&gt; with page rank 5&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    If you are interested, please add the following information to your&lt;br&gt;    website and kindly let me know when it&#039;s ready. I&#039;ll do the same for&lt;br&gt;    you in less than 24 hours, otherwise you can delete my link from&lt;br&gt;    yoursite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Title: Engineering Jobs&lt;br&gt;    URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icerecruit.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.icerecruit.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Description: UK and worldwide engineering job positions and vacancies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I hope you have a nice day and thank you for your time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Best regards;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Freya Smith&lt;br&gt;    Web Marketing Consultant&lt;br&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:freya.smith@colinmason.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;freya.smith@colinmason.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT A SPAM OR AUTOMATED EMAIL, IT&#039;S ONLY A&lt;br&gt;    REQUEST FOR A LINK EXCHANGE. YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS NOT BEEN ADDED TO&lt;br&gt;    ANY LISTS, AND YOU WILL NOT BE CONTACTED AGAIN.IF YOU&#039;D LIKE TO MAKE&lt;br&gt;    SURE WE DON&#039;T CONTACT YOU AGAIN, PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING FORM:&lt;br&gt;    HTTP://WWW.NOMOREMAILS.COM; OR WRITE AN EMAIL TO&lt;br&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:STOP@NOMOREMAILS.COM.PLEASE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;STOP@NOMOREMAILS.COM.PLEASE&lt;/a&gt; ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR CONTACTING YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>    My name is Freya Smith. I&#39;ve just visited your website <br />    and I was wondering if you&#39;d be interested in<br />    exchanging links with my website. I can offer you a HOME PAGE link back<br />    from  2 of my Online Business Guide website wich are:</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.colinmason.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.colinmason.com/</a> with page rank 4<br />    <a href="http://planshabitatservices.com/" rel="nofollow">http://planshabitatservices.com/</a> with page rank 5</p>
<p>    If you are interested, please add the following information to your<br />    website and kindly let me know when it&#39;s ready. I&#39;ll do the same for<br />    you in less than 24 hours, otherwise you can delete my link from<br />    yoursite.</p>
<p>    Title: Engineering Jobs<br />    URL: <a href="http://www.icerecruit.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.icerecruit.com/</a><br />    Description: UK and worldwide engineering job positions and vacancies.</p>
<p>    I hope you have a nice day and thank you for your time.</p>
<p>    Best regards;</p>
<p>    Freya Smith<br />    Web Marketing Consultant<br />    <a href="mailto:&#x66;&#x72;&#x65;&#x79;&#x61;&#x2e;&#x73;&#x6d;&#x69;&#x74;&#x68;&#x40;&#x63;&#x6f;&#x6c;&#x69;&#x6e;&#x6d;&#x61;&#x73;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#x2e;&#x63;&#x6f;&#x6d;" rel="nofollow"><span class=" oe_textdirection">&#x6d;&#x6f;&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6e;&#x6f;&#x73;&#x61;&#x6d;&#x6e;&#x69;&#x6c;&#x6f;&#x63;<span class="oe_displaynone">null</span>&#x40;&#x68;&#x74;&#x69;&#x6d;&#x73;&#x2e;&#x61;&#x79;&#x65;&#x72;&#x66;</span></a></p>
<p>    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT A SPAM OR AUTOMATED EMAIL, IT&#39;S ONLY A<br />    REQUEST FOR A LINK EXCHANGE. YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS NOT BEEN ADDED TO<br />    ANY LISTS, AND YOU WILL NOT BE CONTACTED AGAIN.IF YOU&#39;D LIKE TO MAKE<br />    SURE WE DON&#39;T CONTACT YOU AGAIN, PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING FORM:<br />    HTTP://WWW.NOMOREMAILS.COM; OR WRITE AN EMAIL TO<br />    <a href="mailto:&#x53;&#x54;&#x4f;&#x50;&#x40;&#x4e;&#x4f;&#x4d;&#x4f;&#x52;&#x45;&#x4d;&#x41;&#x49;&#x4c;&#x53;&#x2e;&#x43;&#x4f;&#x4d;&#x2e;&#x50;&#x4c;&#x45;&#x41;&#x53;&#x45;" rel="nofollow"><span class=" oe_textdirection">&#x45;&#x53;&#x41;&#x45;&#x4c;&#x50;&#x2e;&#x4d;&#x4f;&#x43;&#x2e;&#x53;&#x4c;&#x49;&#x41;&#x4d;&#x45;&#x52;&#x4f;&#x4d;&#x4f;&#x4e;<span class="oe_displaynone">null</span>&#x40;&#x50;&#x4f;&#x54;&#x53;</span></a> ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR CONTACTING YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

