Hello, we are social. We are a conversation agency with offices in London, Paris, Milan and Sydney.
We help brands to listen, understand and engage in conversations in social media.

We’re a new kind of agency, but conversations between people are nothing new. Neither is the idea that ‘markets are conversations’.

We’re already helping Coca-Cola, Ford, Unilever, Microsoft, Tesco, Orange, Eurostar, Absolut and WWF.
If you’d like to chat about us helping you too, then give us a call on +44 20 7851 7560 or drop us an email.

London really is the capital of Twitter

by Camille Jouneaux in News on 15 January 2010 at 15:02

After their initial report in June, Sysomos have taken a fresh look at the Twitter population breaking things down by country and also by city.

The US is still the country with the largest amount of users, however the influence of Americans has waned, with only 50.88% of the Twitter population vs. 62.14% in June. The UK is still on the podium, but only in third. Brazil is now the second biggest country with 8.79% of total users whereas the UK represents 7.20% of accounts.

London can be proud that it’s the capital of Twitter, with 2.08% of users, almost 25% bigger than its nearest rival, Los Angeles (perhaps due to the birth of Twestival here, which by the way has just opened registrations for their next event). However, our friends over the pond in New York are still more active than us with 2.37% of tweets coming from NY vs. 2.12% from London.

Looking deeper into the figures, there is something fascinating: the slow ascension on the platform of countries such as Brazil, India and China, three of the four BRICs. I think it’s worth keeping an eye on this – I would be curious to read a future survey comparing the economy of these countries with their presence on the international social media scene.

Update: Sysomos have released an extended list of the top countries and cities on Twitter.

  • Darth Revan
    @stedavies' method is wrong because his google query is flawed, not because Google is flawed though.

    The query captures a lot of other parts of the text in a twitter profile page.

    Using his method we will find that there are more twitter users in Haiti than in Sweden
    http://bit.ly/4wSsor
    http://bit.ly/7rBSXN

    Check this one out too:
    http://twitter.com/doRroughmusic

    He's in Dallas, Texas but is included in your "New York" search because his home page has a lot of "New York" in it.

    Anyhow, my point is the google query given above is flawed. Popular terms like Haiti or New York occur very often, and the google query above incorrectly pulls them in.
  • Interesting point you raise on the BRIC countries. China actually has a home-grown Twitter rip-off called Fanfou, which has a fairly significant user base, along with a handful of smaller micro-blogging platforms.
  • @kuito
    Yesterday, i read another article about a very recent study that said Tokyo was "the most tweeter city", but the article didn't cleared if it refers to number of tweeter profiles registered or whatever....
  • The Google method is also based on self declaring. Not sure, who would you trust the most to give more accurate results? Google or Twittergrader? I'd go for Google myself.

    But even if Twittergrader was more trustworthy over Google it doesn't get passed the fact that the majority of IPs are based in London and so invalidate the results.
  • DominicCampbell
    And you're certain there isn't the same phenomenon for other parts of the world eg New York and LA pulling in surrounding areas? Basically I think we can all agree - lots of people use Twitter in these places because they are big places and the way we do geo-location is flawed but improving. No?
  • dominiccampbell
    TwitterGradr seems to agree with Camille based on how people are self-declaring, which seems the best measure I would have thought?

    http://twitter.grader.com/top/cities
  • Results are wrong I'm afraid. IP networks in the UK generally all have their location in London. So even if I'm Newcastle my IP address location still says London.

    Using Google for a quick and dirty measure shows that New York has more twitterers than London:

    New York = 1,390,000
    http://bit.ly/5Pwok6

    London = 316,000
    http://bit.ly/8gyVWh
  • @stedavies I agree, IP addresses are not a good way to infer geography. And this is why sysomos does NOT use IP addresses in any way. We use our own technology to infer geography based on what you disclose - and we have bench-marked it to be over 97% accurate.
  • Fair enough. How do you explain how Google counts New York bigger than London in terms of what people disclose in their biogs? See the links in my comment above. Is Google's data inaccurate?
  • Google's number of search results are never accurate. In fact they are often off by as much as 10 times.

    See the two links below. Both search for waterloo users. The first link is the first search page showing 1720 results. The second is after I go to the 17th search page and it shows only 165 results (instead of 1720).
    http://bit.ly/7uL2yD
    http://bit.ly/7NfhGs
  • Good point. But even if Google's results are out by as much as ten times by ratio New York is still bigger. E.g. Let's say that the total number is only ten percent of Google results number shown, that would make New York = 139,000 and London = 31,600.

    Not saying this is accurate but going off what you said about the results being ten times out it's a valid assumption.
  • alex
    Also, from Sysomos' report, " ... table showing unique Twitter users around the world from Oct. 16, 2009 to Dec. 16, 2009. ..". This means that their data is derived from examining those who have tweeted in the 2 month period. Hence the discrepency between the google query you gave, and their data. At the end of the day, sample size in the order of tens of millions is more than sufficient for this kind of inference.
  • Google' results are NOT always exactly 10 times off. Sometime they are close to accurate, sometime a little off and sometimes completely off. It is a mistake to even consider them useful.
  • It's a mistake to consider Google's search results useful? Quite a controversial statement to make.
  • London - the Capital of Twitter - that is surely due to the vibrant startup community we have here and the melting pot of talent. BRICs is an outmoded term anyway - only having an I in order to have a vowel in it some commentators say.
blog comments powered by Disqus