<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Are Social’s Monday Mashup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Grant</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Andy - a really good point, which we&#039;d agree with. Jordan did link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://threeminds.organic.com/2009/11/socializers_a_new_breed_of_onl.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marta Strickland&#039;s comments on the research&lt;/a&gt;, who also raised the same question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; a really good point, which we&#39;d agree with. Jordan did link to <a href="http://threeminds.organic.com/2009/11/socializers_a_new_breed_of_onl.html" rel="nofollow">Marta Strickland&#39;s comments on the research</a>, who also raised the same question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andyh</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Andyh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>I wonder how helpful it is to class the unique phenomenon that is Wikipedia as social media - given it accounts for half of Nielsen&#039;s &#039;18% social-media-as-primary-vehicle-for-content-discovery&#039; score above. It&#039;s hardly like &#039;wikis&#039; as a category are up there with blogs and social networks as content discovery media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how helpful it is to class the unique phenomenon that is Wikipedia as social media &#8211; given it accounts for half of Nielsen&#39;s &#39;18% social-media-as-primary-vehicle-for-content-discovery&#39; score above. It&#39;s hardly like &#39;wikis&#39; as a category are up there with blogs and social networks as content discovery media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Grant</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>Andy - a really good point, which we&#039;d agree with. Jordan did link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://threeminds.organic.com/2009/11/socializers_a_new_breed_of_onl.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marta Strickland&#039;s comments on the research&lt;/a&gt;, who also raised the same question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; a really good point, which we&#39;d agree with. Jordan did link to <a href="http://threeminds.organic.com/2009/11/socializers_a_new_breed_of_onl.html" rel="nofollow">Marta Strickland&#39;s comments on the research</a>, who also raised the same question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andyh</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Andyh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>I wonder how helpful it is to class the unique phenomenon that is Wikipedia as social media - given it accounts for half of Nielsen&#039;s &#039;18% social-media-as-primary-vehicle-for-content-discovery&#039; score above. It&#039;s hardly like &#039;wikis&#039; as a category are up there with blogs and social networks as content discovery media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how helpful it is to class the unique phenomenon that is Wikipedia as social media &#8211; given it accounts for half of Nielsen&#39;s &#39;18% social-media-as-primary-vehicle-for-content-discovery&#39; score above. It&#39;s hardly like &#39;wikis&#39; as a category are up there with blogs and social networks as content discovery media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cakeorbed</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>cakeorbed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Interesting to revisit the Neal&#039;s Yard debacle. I cringe for them when I think how totally underprepared they were for the Q&amp;A but their defensive statement to PRWeek seems to show how little they&#039;ve learnt from it. They missed their chance to respond in any meaningful way either during or after the debate and now appear to be withdrawing from the &#039;volatile&#039; online space altogether. A bit of a shakeup needed, methinks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the post, hope it does indeed become semi-regular :)&lt;br&gt;- Katie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to revisit the Neal&#39;s Yard debacle. I cringe for them when I think how totally underprepared they were for the Q&#038;A but their defensive statement to PRWeek seems to show how little they&#39;ve learnt from it. They missed their chance to respond in any meaningful way either during or after the debate and now appear to be withdrawing from the &#39;volatile&#39; online space altogether. A bit of a shakeup needed, methinks. </p>
<p>Thanks for the post, hope it does indeed become semi-regular <img src='http://wearesocial.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />- Katie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Harvey</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad about Twitters RT function. About time. Now they need to get a predictive @username function like on Tweetdeck or FB, built in URL shortening and the ability to search your own following/followers. In fact they should just make themselves altogether more like Tweetdeck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad about Twitters RT function. About time. Now they need to get a predictive @username function like on Tweetdeck or FB, built in URL shortening and the ability to search your own following/followers. In fact they should just make themselves altogether more like Tweetdeck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Nimeh</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2940#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>FEED is always worth a read. Thanks for the reminder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEED is always worth a read. Thanks for the reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

