Comments on: We Are Social’s Monday Mashup #4 http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup-4/ Mon, 21 May 2012 13:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Claire Thompson http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2217 Claire Thompson Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:13:13 +0000 http://wearesocial.net/?p=3088#comment-2217 "The results of the PRWeek poll only show the naivety towards social media in the PR industry; they haven’t got their heads round it and aren’t set up for it."<br><br>1. It's a certain sector read PR week<br>2. It's a certain sector that would fill in the poll.<br>3. There isn't an 'it depends' button which was what Neville Hobson (@jangles) is on record as saying he would have liked to have seen - he voted yes, incidentally, and by all accounts he does understand social media :-)<br>4. Around half do - if the vote has anything to do with it.<br><br>I wouldn't pay a blogger to put up a post, and a large no of other PRs apparently agree, but some bloggers accept payments. Which probably says more about the blogger than the PR industry that buys them? Just a thought. “The results of the PRWeek poll only show the naivety towards social media in the PR industry; they haven’t got their heads round it and aren’t set up for it.”

1. It's a certain sector read PR week
2. It's a certain sector that would fill in the poll.
3. There isn't an 'it depends' button which was what Neville Hobson (@jangles) is on record as saying he would have liked to have seen – he voted yes, incidentally, and by all accounts he does understand social media :-)
4. Around half do – if the vote has anything to do with it.

I wouldn't pay a blogger to put up a post, and a large no of other PRs apparently agree, but some bloggers accept payments. Which probably says more about the blogger than the PR industry that buys them? Just a thought.

]]> By: claireatwaves http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/11/socials-monday-mashup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1490 claireatwaves Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:13:13 +0000 http://wearesocial.net/?p=3088#comment-1490 "The results of the PRWeek poll only show the naivety towards social media in the PR industry; they haven’t got their heads round it and aren’t set up for it."<br><br>1. It's a certain sector read PR week<br>2. It's a certain sector that would fill in the poll.<br>3. There isn't an 'it depends' button which was what Neville Hobson (@jangles) is on record as saying he would have liked to have seen - he voted yes, incidentally, and by all accounts he does understand social media :-)<br>4. Around half do - if the vote has anything to do with it.<br><br>I wouldn't pay a blogger to put up a post, and a large no of other PRs apparently agree, but some bloggers accept payments. Which probably says more about the blogger than the PR industry that buys them? Just a thought. “The results of the PRWeek poll only show the naivety towards social media in the PR industry; they haven’t got their heads round it and aren’t set up for it.”

1. It's a certain sector read PR week
2. It's a certain sector that would fill in the poll.
3. There isn't an 'it depends' button which was what Neville Hobson (@jangles) is on record as saying he would have liked to have seen – he voted yes, incidentally, and by all accounts he does understand social media :-)
4. Around half do – if the vote has anything to do with it.

I wouldn't pay a blogger to put up a post, and a large no of other PRs apparently agree, but some bloggers accept payments. Which probably says more about the blogger than the PR industry that buys them? Just a thought.

]]>