Hello, we are social. We are a conversation agency. We help brands to listen, understand and engage in conversations in social media.

We’re a new kind of agency, but conversations between people are nothing new. Neither is the idea that ‘markets are conversations’.

We’re already helping Ford, Skype, Eurostar, The Economist, Absolut, Dunlop, Barclaycard and the WWF.
If you’d like to chat about us helping you too, then give us a call on +44 20 7576 5137 or drop us an email.

The Destination and The Conversation

by Robin Grant in News on 28 September 2009 at 16:16

Our friend Nick Burcher, Head of Products / Partnerships EMEA at Publicis’ VivaKi, drew me a diagram last time we caught up for coffee outlining his social media world view, which he’s since written up. I think it’s a valuable perspective (although there is something missing, which I’ll come to below):

The Destination and The Conversation

The Destination
Traditionally marketing efforts have focussed around ‘The Destination.’ Ad space is bought to push people to a main site / microsite and this could be anything from Paid Search to TV to Print. It’s all about ‘go here now!’ There is a direct correlation between ad spend and ‘Destination’ traffic. Generally increase in ad spend = increase in traffic and decreasing ad spend results in decreasing traffic.

This is changing though. New ‘Destinations’ are being created, it’s no longer just a main site or a microsite. Facebook Fan Pages are being used as an activity hub with paid ads driving traffic. Alternatively the Destination could be a YouTube channel or other social platform.

The social web is also providing new traffic driving opportunities eg Facebook Engagement ads, sponsored Diggs or socialmedia.com social banners but the biggest change to the internet landscape though is the emergence of ‘The Conversation.’

Web 1.0 was a one way street. Users went to a site and consumed information and advertisers served messages somewhere along the way. The publisher published, the consumer consumed, the advertiser advertised . On the social web the distinctions between these three areas have all blurred and changed marketing forever.

The Conversation
If advertisers can successfully participate in the Conversation then it becomes less about paid pushing. The Conversation is about engaging rather than broadcasting, and if done successfully it changes the equation. Instead of having to pay to recruit every visit, consumers can be co-opted as brand ambassadors who then will freely relay the advertiser message with consequent Destination traffic the result.

Activity targeting the Conversation needs this ‘kickstart’ to give it initial momentum. This is where new disciplines like blogger outreach and video seeding come in. This is where marketers need to think of taking content to the consumer, rather than expecting consumers to come to them – and make it easy to share using ‘Blog This’ buttons, Facebook Connect and more.

Nick is right to point that it’s no longer just about ad spend, that Destinations no longer need to be microsites (if they ever did), that the Conversation is about engaging rather than broadcasting, and that traffic can flow from the Destination to the Conversation. But what the model doesn’t take account of, is the fact that it’s the Conversation, not the Destination, that’s important, and that in some cases there doesn’t need to be a Destination.

The Conversation itself sometimes can fulfill your business or marketing objectives without reference to a Destination, creating demand by driving awareness, consideration and/or engagement through far-reaching word of mouth – whether that be through simply getting the product into the hands of bloggers and generating reviews, through viral seeding where the vast majority of the video views happen out there in the conversation cloud or through a myriad of other ways.

More progressively (and effectively), you still have a Destination, but it’s designed to facilitate, support and amplify the Conversation, and success is measured not in traffic to the Destination, but in the reach, sentiment and engagement with the Conversation itself.

tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

  • "The Conversation vs. The Destination" is a really good way of helping brands better understand and leverage Social Media. I believe that the metrics mentioned - 'reach', 'sentiment' and 'engagement' are better indicators of Return on Marketing Investment than traffic related metrics.

    However the challenge is to actually measure and track these metrics across all online sources where these conversations are taking place.

    The mushrooming number of sources and subject areas within these sources makes locating, filtering out the noise and then monitoring those sources for the valuable nuggets makes this an increasingly complex task.

    However, with the latest scalable NLP tools (http://tinyurl.com/lspxwp), Social Media insights in the form of real-time alerts of rising issues or emerging trends, topic and sentiment or online influencers can be quickly derived, disseminated and acted upon.

    Here are a few useful links on the topic:

    The Problems with Social Media Monitoring (http://tinyurl.com/ycxoyga)
    The Dirty Little Secret of Social Media Monitoring (http://tinyurl.com/nog2tj)
    A Brand's Largest Social Media Obstacle (http://tinyurl.com/l8l5qg)
    Thinking about Influencer Marketing (http://tinyurl.com/ye485u2)
    The sociability spec: documenting social interaction requirements (http://tinyurl.com/yd6e2uu)
  • An Advertising Destination designed to facilitate, support and amplify the Conversation and Social Interaction - that can indeed be the key to future ways to create and promote brands. Engage instead of seat and look, ongoing interaction instead of passive media comsuming.
  • Destination/Conversation is very much akin to the Inbound Marketing mantra of companies such as Hubspot - i.e. publish, optimise, share. The point being, your homepage is no longer your home. You need to be wherever the conversation is. Hubspot are more brutal about getting results from this than most. I'd recommend watching their spoof rap video, "Baby got Leads" ;)
  • The model is designed to show the optimum way that Destination and Conversation strategies can work together. However, I think it is still the exception rather than the norm to see both Destination and Conversation integrated to form a single strategy. For the time being it is more likely that there will be two different styles of campaign - with activity either built around a Destination or a Conversation. You can therefore draw a line down the centre of the chart and still have a workable framework for either.

    There still has to be something that the Conversation is based on though. This, as you say, may not necessarily be a 'Destination' in it's truest / traditional sense, but Conversation does need an anchor (a focal point) before it can be amplified and spread.
  • This is a really interesting blog post and it challenges us all to think about the ultimate aim of a campaign. If we start a conversation about a brand, can we deem that a 'social media 'success? Does the conversation need to have a positive sentiment to be a success?
    We're all being challenged to rethink the metrics of success and this requires a brand new way of thinking. Data capture is increasingly becoming a focus of marketing campaigns, but maybe we should look at a friend or follower as having the same (more) value than an email address.

    It's down to the individual marketer to determine which is the 'destination' and it's how we choose to engage with the community that drives how we get them there.
  • Very interesting post, Robin, thanks for writing it. I think introducing "conversation" is where the listening starts, and not just talking. The two-way communication model is far more important... and beneficial.
blog comments powered by Disqus