<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hype Cycle and the Twitter backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:24:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MisEntropy</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>MisEntropy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2375#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Plannersphere Top 20/20 - September 2009...&lt;/strong&gt;

The top 20 planning blogs in September 2009 and the top 20 planning blog posts from August 2009....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Plannersphere Top 20/20 &#8211; September 2009&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The top 20 planning blogs in September 2009 and the top 20 planning blog posts from August 2009&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is social media a fad? &#171; Kathryn Corrick</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Is social media a fad? &#171; Kathryn Corrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2375#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>[...] is the graph by Gartner for emerging technologies, taken from their latest report, courtesy of We Are Social. It shows how different elements of the social media phenomenons mentioned in the Socialnomics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the graph by Gartner for emerging technologies, taken from their latest report, courtesy of We Are Social. It shows how different elements of the social media phenomenons mentioned in the Socialnomics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-12 &#171; Raw Stylus &#8211; A blog by Chris Hoskin</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-12 &#171; Raw Stylus &#8211; A blog by Chris Hoskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2375#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>[...] Gartner Hype Cycle 2009 (tags: gartner, hype cycle, real time web, Twitter trends Models) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gartner Hype Cycle 2009 (tags: gartner, hype cycle, real time web, Twitter trends Models) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherinewhite</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>catherinewhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2375#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Excellent read, thank you for this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent read, thank you for this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estebankolsky</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/08/hype-cycle-twitter-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>estebankolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=2375#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>Nathan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am afraid that you are the one who does not get it totally.  Microblogging is gone past the peak and is slowly descending into the trough.  and this is good, if you understand what that means.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it means that we are finally figuring out what it really does, how it really works, and what we can do with it.  it means that we are learning our lessons on how to do it well and how to do it badly.  it means that it hit (or is about to hit) critical mass and become more widely adopted and implemented.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it means that your business of being a &quot;twitter expert&quot; will be more in demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;hyped technologies are rarely adopted and implemented in sufficient numbers to make a dent, it is the ones that are descending or are already in the trough that get the most investment and lower attention.  but that is good.  i could not care less for ashton kutcher and oprah and what they have to say, but i am very interested in seeing how twitter and other SM tools become useful in the enterprise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and for that, and gartner gets it better than you obviously, you need to be in the trough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(and, btw, gartner highlighted the importance of the real-time web about 5-6 years ago -- so there is something to be said about getting it ahead of the rest -- ain&#039;t it)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Esteban Kolsky&lt;br&gt;Former Gartner Analyst</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>I am afraid that you are the one who does not get it totally.  Microblogging is gone past the peak and is slowly descending into the trough.  and this is good, if you understand what that means.  </p>
<p>it means that we are finally figuring out what it really does, how it really works, and what we can do with it.  it means that we are learning our lessons on how to do it well and how to do it badly.  it means that it hit (or is about to hit) critical mass and become more widely adopted and implemented.  </p>
<p>it means that your business of being a &#8220;twitter expert&#8221; will be more in demand.</p>
<p>hyped technologies are rarely adopted and implemented in sufficient numbers to make a dent, it is the ones that are descending or are already in the trough that get the most investment and lower attention.  but that is good.  i could not care less for ashton kutcher and oprah and what they have to say, but i am very interested in seeing how twitter and other SM tools become useful in the enterprise.</p>
<p>and for that, and gartner gets it better than you obviously, you need to be in the trough.</p>
<p>(and, btw, gartner highlighted the importance of the real-time web about 5-6 years ago &#8212; so there is something to be said about getting it ahead of the rest &#8212; ain&#39;t it)</p>
<p>Esteban Kolsky<br />Former Gartner Analyst</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
