Hello, we are social. We are a conversation agency. We help brands to listen, understand and engage in conversations in social media.

We’re a new kind of agency, but conversations between people are nothing new. Neither is the idea that ‘markets are conversations’.

We’re already helping Ford, Skype, Eurostar, The Economist, Absolut, Dunlop, Barclaycard and the WWF.
If you’d like to chat about us helping you too, then give us a call on +44 20 7576 5137 or drop us an email.

The purchase funnel is no more

by Robin Grant in News on 29 June 2009 at 16:16

The purchase funnel has always been one of the main tenets of marketing theory.

purchase funnel

We’ve intuitively known for while that it no longer holds true (if it ever did), but despite many attempts, we’ve had nothing come along that’s replaced it. For example, Forrester had a go a couple of years ago with the diagram below, but crucially it failed to provide a model that was easy to visualise, and it failed to catch on (surprisingly, neither did Giles Rhys Jones’ simpler alternative).

Forrester's funnel

Now, finally, we have a viable alternative model, along with the science to back it up. McKinsey have conducted a study examining the purchase decisions of almost 20,000 consumers across five industries and three continents, and come up with what they call the consumer decision journey:

The funnel concept fails to capture all the touch points and key buying factors resulting from the explosion of product choices and digital channels, coupled with the emergence of an increasingly discerning, well-informed consumer. A more sophisticated approach is required to help marketers navigate this environment, which is less linear and more complicated than the funnel suggests. We call this approach the consumer decision journey.

Because of the shift away from one-way communication — from marketers to consumers — toward a two-way conversation, marketers need a more systematic way to satisfy customer demands and manage word-of-mouth.

consumer decision journey

We hate the word ‘consumer’ (we are all people as far as We Are Social is concerned), but that doesn’t make their model any less valid. David Court, Director of McKinsey’s global Marketing & Sales practice, has an excellent presentation that explains the research and what it means for marketers. The most salient parts being:

You have a trigger of some sort, where people start across the decision journey — they are now going to move towards purchase. The first stage is initial consideration. In many industries, people actually start in their initial consideration of a brand with a relatively narrow list, we believe because of the busy lives and bombardment of media — it’s just very difficult to get through all this clutter in this consumers initial consideration set. However, once the consumer decides they are going to buy a product, they move into a stage that we call active evaluation. It is here that the number of brands they are considering increases. Which is exactly the opposite of the premise of the funnel, going from broad to narrow. This is the stage when the consumer is intent on purchasing and they are actively researching the product.

What marketers should know
The most important thing for marketers to do is to make sure that their marketing activities are aligned against how their consumers research and buy products [...] companies need to look at their messaging in light of where they have the greatest opportunity. For example, companies’ messaging is all about trying to get into the initial consideration set, and yet, when the consumer reaches out during their active evaluation stage, they’re not providing the right facts and testimonials that the consumer is looking for [...] most companies are going to have to make fundamental investment in what we would call consumer driven marketing

Consumer versus company driven touchpoints
We analytically looked at which touchpoints were most influencing the consumer’s decision. We found two types — company driven versus consumer driven. In consumer driven, the consumer is reaching out to get information — they’re talking to their friends, doing internet searches, seeing what’s said on third party sites.

In the initial consideration it was still very much still company driven — the advertising was a very critical part of the touch points that influenced the consumer. However, when we got into active evaluation, two thirds of the influence of those most powerful touchpoints were from consumer driven touchpoints — word of mouth, talking to friends and family, searching on the internet.

And that is a very big change — you need to develop ways for people to talk about your product, so that word of mouth works. Be represented on independent internet sites where people will go and research and buy products. Because, if you don’t have enough presence on those types of consumer driven approaches, when the consumer is reaching out during active evaluation, you’re not there for them to find.

Amen to that…

tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • This is nothing new at all. The purchase funnel, although always drawn as a funnel, has always been considered a loop. It's always worked that way because existing customers make repeat purchases, something that the literal basic diagram doesn't obviously demonstrate.
  • This is HUGE.
  • Nathan - have you actually looked at the presentation or at least read the bits I highlighted? How about this bit:

    once the consumer decides they are going to buy a product, they move into a stage that we call active evaluation. It is here that the number of brands they are considering increases. Which is exactly the opposite of the premise of the funnel

    To me, it not only seems pretty new, but it also has a proper grounding:

    a study examining the purchase decisions of almost 20,000 consumers across five industries and three continents
  • Rowan Schaaf
    We've run research specifically in the automotive sector for one of our clients that completely backed that up. We're a lot more complicated than the funnel presumes; and that by the way, has to be a good thing!
  • Consumers did 'active evaluation' before the internet existed, let alone social media. That's why ancient publications like 'Which?' exist/ed. Old school mate ;-)
  • First!

    Gah. Crap. Fifth!

    The Cyclical Funnel sounds like something at Alton Towers. Or a sex clinic.
  • captain cupcake
    I think its valuable thinking, Robin; though revolutionary is maybe a overstatement.

    All purchase cycles have a purchase trigger then research, consideration, transaction, usage and re-purchase phases. The tread that runs through these phases is 'recommendations'; assessing or rejecting products based on reviews, peers, adverts and your own rational/emotional experiences.

    Advertising is brands recommending themselves. David Ogilvy talked about 'brands who talk well of themselves' and 'ensuring your products get in the consideration set' all his career.
  • bah humbug!

    I didn't say 'revolutionary' - I said:

    a viable alternative model, along with the science to back it up
  • captain cupcake
    Shame that McKinsey isn't as ground breaking as they like to think they are.
  • I am truly trying not to laugh here... OK I give up - I am laughing!

    'most companies are going to have to make fundamental investment in what we would call consumer driven marketing' - really. Sort of like having an ad to attract attention perhaps and then a website for more info. Shock horror - the genius of it all!!!

    The funnel isn't really a funnel at all - coz it gets bigger in the middle. Not true of many categories - and we don't like too much choice so we whittle things down to what people like us are buying. Still linear though innit? And it's not a funnel - it's a loop - yep always was with people repurchasing. Getting the giggles again here.

    Surely most marketers get that they will attract prospects using emotionally based advertising to get onto the consideration list, then provide details and back up information to be shared with family and friends in the active evaluation phase through brochures, mailings, websites, Twitter feeds etc.

    Luckily all this groundbreaking stuff is backed up with lots of focus groups. Genius. Is this a spoof? Is Marcus Brown behind this? My advice Robin - take it down quick!
  • Hey Mark

    I don't know. It seemed useful to me yesterday (obviously partially for selfish reasons). It still seems useful today.

    None of the advice they give is revolutionary, but it is sound, it is backed by their research and it is from McKinsey.
  • Consumer driven marketings a really bad way to put it... What this brings home for me is the need to understand (and optimise, maybe even measure effectiveness of) all the touch points that you have with your audience/customers. That goes for digital, offline, call centres, email, door drop and all other media. It's the only way to begin to understand the consideration funnel (funnel, doughnut, lump, mobius strip - whatever shape yours is) for your offering and the people who congregate around it and eventually might buy into it.

    Yep, none of this is ground breaking but it is often forgotten. Plough all your dollars into your website and you may get no benefits if the rest of the 'customer' journey is a muddy quagmire they have to wade through.

    IMO the best thing about studies/papers like this is that they get you thinking and stimulate debate!
  • dayoadefila
    The getting people thinking part is really the point. Marketers, advertising folks tend to - quite amazingly forget one of the primal laws of social science - Man is dynamic! Thanks Robin
  • Because it's McKinsey doesn't make it right or useful.

    They should stay in the realms of stripping costs out of value chains rather than getting into marketing. But, having said that - if you find it useful then that is wonderful.

    There are better and more useful marketing models out there - albeit they were written a long time ago. Doesn't make them wrong or useless either.
  • I think it's solid. Models are as valuable as what they illuminate/predict. In this one I see a lot absent from the funnel model:

    - Brands matter because they buy you one of a limited number of places at the starting gate of a purchase decision by a busy consumer
    - The "trigger" notion, which points to a future application of real-time channels like Twitter and mobile.
    - The elevation of Consumer-driven touchpoints as a medium at least on par with Company-driven touchpoints.

    Good post, Robin.
  • I'm in the 'useful' camp on this one.

    if the report does nothing else than make communications plans less-'awareness for the sake of it' focussed, and more inclusive of media that is:
    always on
    on demand
    social
    and integrated into dCRM...

    ...then it will have served a purpose
  • This is a great post Robin. Many of us have known that you have to flip the funnel upside down and start with influencers or advocates. I like this chart because it talks about the behavior people go through when making decisions and the importance of a community to help them find the right answer.
  • Erm. Bit of role play: "I am a sales manager. This isn't news. My SAP sales funnel and CRM covers all brand touch points and stages in their decision cycle anyway. Some of those points are looked after by sales, some support, some marketing, and if i really have to, PR. So what does this tell me that I am not already doing with my CRM?"

    I can't see the difference in the way that adds value to accomplished sales people. Am i missing something? PS I'm a online pr and content marketer.
  • Leave McKinsey out of this!! It's not easy to make a fortune by stating the obvious.

    Besides - the evolution of the purchasing funnel may very well be "nothing new" to the audience of this blog; but when traditional agencies are still clinging to traditional media spend, it's hard to tell if the marketing industry has really caught up with consumers.

    Bottom line - if I see one more marketing theory or process wheel (or funnel, chain, cycle, you name it) then I think I'll throw up. But it's always helpful to visualize the entire process when allocating marketing/sales efforts (and budgets). Now it would be nice to see other agencies and consultants actually recommending these approaches instead of the same "old but lucrative" media plans.

    Nicely written article Robin!!
  • I think Roberts comments are valid - rather more considered than my outburst. One good thing about it all is that these kinds of approaches and frameworks are now being broadcast to a wider audience - many of whom I concede may not have seen them before and that is important. It was as Robert says - a well written article Robin - apologies for my earlier churlishness. ;
  • Splitter!
  • Hi Robin,
    Enjoyed the post and comments. In my view the McKinsey model is interesting but does not really negate the funnel model. The starting point of the McKinsey model already assumes Awareness - by definition you can't consider a brand unless you are aware of it. The notion of expanding and shifting consideration sets is more realistic, but again you have to become aware of a brand in order to add them to your consideration set. I think believe the McKinsey model adds some interesting insight but is not truly revolutionary thinking.

    No one has touched on perhaps the biggest reason to develop a linear model - so we can apply linear mathematics to create statistical models. Marketing theorists understand consumer purchase behavior is closer to chaos theory than it is linear behavior, but the math becomes overly complicated. All linear models are an attempt to simplify.

    Thanks, Don B @donbart
  • CraigElias
    It’s interesting to see McKinsey starting to notice the ‘Trigger Event’ economy.

    I would argue that people have always bought based upon ‘Trigger Events’ but it was not until recently the something ‘Triggered’ McKinsey’s understanding.

    I have always agreed with the AIDA (Awareness, Interest, Desire, Interest) model but understood that it is a ‘Trigger Event’ that creates the desire that leads to the action.

    ‘Trigger Events’ are as applicable to B2B sales as they are to B2C.

    The specific ‘Trigger Events’ may be different but the analogy stays the same.

    Craig Elias
    Creator of Trigger Event Selling™
  • daisytagger
    This McKinsey loop looks like a cross section of the funnel, maybe somewhere around consideration, as it narrows toward purchase and loops around for loyalty.
  • Looks like a lot of thought went into the analysis. I like how it provides a simple framework for mapping the consumer decisionmaking process.

    I have some mild differences of opinion based on my experiences in retail and hospitality. I wish the model took into account multiple moments of truth, not just the moment of purchase. A single bad experience -- if it aligns with the consumer's priorities -- can tip the entire apple cart. Also, it appears the model lumps in concepts like 'clientele' (i.e. LTV) and referrals under "postpurchase experience".

    Nice diagram, one of the better posts I've seen.
  • captain cupcake
    If anybody on this blog hasn't been saying this stuff to their clients for the last 10 years they rapidly deserve another career. Only ATL and media agencies accept that any work is about awaerness - simply becase its lazy, easy to achieve and can be bought with enough spend. Engagement that helps people make informed decisions and provides a experience with a company they want to recommend is they only focus we should be having.
  • draytonbird
    I am astounded that I've managed to make a living selling all kinds of stuff to all kinds of people all these years without any funnels, loops or diagrams whatsoever. They all fall into the "that's interesting/obvious/irrelevant/so bloody what" categories. The truth is, all industries and situations differ; and marketers generally prove Bertrand Russell's adage: "What men seek is not knowledge, but certainty."
  • stewartatkins
    There is a value in this if only to help articulate a communications strategy to a prospective client that goes beyond 'traditional' media and embraces the social kind as well in as integrated a fashion as we can best create. So from my current pragmatic perspective whether new or not if we can get it on to one slide and it helps win a pitch then right now its good!
  • Mckinsey is confusing the psychology of buying with a marketer’s approach to intervening in the process.

    The linear progression that McKinsey challenges is based on AIDA – Awareness, Interest, Desire & Action.

    To my knowledge, nobody has ever maintained that this is how people buy. We have understood since Maslow was a boy that human actions are based on fulfilling needs. When we have a need, we set about fulfilling it at a speed dictated by the urgency of the requirement and the degree of risk in the decision.

    AIDA remains valid and has its place for those that understand it. To claim insight from the revelation that purchases are needs and desires driven is like proclaiming the Earth orbits the Sun.
    http://bit.ly/DE08j
  • The McKinsey model is a big "duh!" And, it misses the point about the increasing number and types of triggers and influencers which the Forrester model suggests are important for us to think about.

    Net is that how people's actual needs and awareness/perceptions/feelings about brands and products intersect continues to get more dynamic, complex and micro every day. It's both exciting and daunting. Fundamental to it all is the need to have a good grasp, from beginning to end, about how your customers behave and feel towards you and your products.

    Call it funnel. Call it a very long tube. Call it an architecture. It's all the same at the end of the day. Know thy customer.
blog comments powered by Disqus