<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who owns social media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:46:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The great game / we are social</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>The great game / we are social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-864</guid>
		<description>[...] mass of best practise that accelerated the gap between them and their offline competitors, so conversation agencies will do the same to PR agencies (and, I have to say, to the digital and other agencies also trying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mass of best practise that accelerated the gap between them and their offline competitors, so conversation agencies will do the same to PR agencies (and, I have to say, to the digital and other agencies also trying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-709</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anybody owns it. Some PR companies have been doing great things and so have some Digital shops (some haven&#039;t). Where does a failed media buyer like Joseph Jaffe fit in to the picture I wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think anybody owns it. Some PR companies have been doing great things and so have some Digital shops (some haven&#39;t). Where does a failed media buyer like Joseph Jaffe fit in to the picture I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Grant</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-705</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan, @Nigel and @James - I&#039;ve added an update to the post to make things clearer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan, @Nigel and @James &#8211; I&#39;ve added an update to the post to make things clearer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gurd, e-inbusiness</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gurd, e-inbusiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the marketing obsession with trying to brand control everything and therefore missing the point entirely. People own their own content, though if they post it in public forums it is available to be used and shared. I want to see companies thinking less about ownership and more about engagement. Unleash the brand shackles and let your community grow with nurture (support, advice, monitoring to protect integrity) and nature (the organic actions of your audience).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the marketing obsession with trying to brand control everything and therefore missing the point entirely. People own their own content, though if they post it in public forums it is available to be used and shared. I want to see companies thinking less about ownership and more about engagement. Unleash the brand shackles and let your community grow with nurture (support, advice, monitoring to protect integrity) and nature (the organic actions of your audience).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renaissance chambara &#124; Ged Carroll - Links of the day</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>renaissance chambara &#124; Ged Carroll - Links of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-687</guid>
		<description>[...] Who owns social media? / we are social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who owns social media? / we are social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-686</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/ActiveLife&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/ActiveLife) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Who owns Social Media? [link to post] @wearesocial&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - Posted using Chat Catcher </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/ActiveLife" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div title="ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<div title="ActiveLife (Johan De Keulenaer)" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/ActiveLife) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<p></a><br />
Who owns Social Media? [link to post] @wearesocial</p>
<p> &#8211; Posted using Chat Catcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Legg</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Legg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-684</guid>
		<description>We are social own this blog, but I own this comment.  With Social media your actions are in the open - just because it&#039;s considered unproven doesn&#039;t mean you can leap in with wild experiments, without thinking things through first.  Everyone owns social media - in fact the person who talks the longest get&#039;s heard the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are social own this blog, but I own this comment.  With Social media your actions are in the open &#8211; just because it&#39;s considered unproven doesn&#39;t mean you can leap in with wild experiments, without thinking things through first.  Everyone owns social media &#8211; in fact the person who talks the longest get&#39;s heard the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ged Carroll</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Ged Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-681</guid>
		<description>The smartest guys in the room with the best ideas and the client&#039;s trust. If you wanted to be really controversial you should have asked who really owns PR now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smartest guys in the room with the best ideas and the client&#39;s trust. If you wanted to be really controversial you should have asked who really owns PR now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-680</guid>
		<description>No one does. Social media = the web. And that belongs to everybody ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one does. Social media = the web. And that belongs to everybody <img src='http://wearesocial.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger, Online PR Agency C&#38;M</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger, Online PR Agency C&#38;M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=1184#comment-679</guid>
		<description>my guess is that PR agencies will continue to win business, make mistakes, but learn along the way.  n the meantime, best practise will be established by niche players like your good selves.  then WPP will buy everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my guess is that PR agencies will continue to win business, make mistakes, but learn along the way.  n the meantime, best practise will be established by niche players like your good selves.  then WPP will buy everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
