<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the front page of Marketing today&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:46:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brands and Twitter / we are social</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Brands and Twitter / we are social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-527</guid>
		<description>[...] after being on the front page on Marketing the week before last, this week we’ve hit the pages of Campaign, with our inclusion in a feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after being on the front page on Marketing the week before last, this week we’ve hit the pages of Campaign, with our inclusion in a feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/graeme_harrison&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/graeme_harrison) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
A few lucky twitterers have unexpectedly made the front of marketing today!! [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - Posted using Chat Catcher </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/graeme_harrison" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div title="graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<div title="graeme_harrison (Graeme Harrison)" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/graeme_harrison) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<p></a><br />
A few lucky twitterers have unexpectedly made the front of marketing today!! [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; Posted using Chat Catcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew B</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Good work getting your comments and those of your clients in the mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work getting your comments and those of your clients in the mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger, Online PR Agency C&#38;M</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger, Online PR Agency C&#38;M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-477</guid>
		<description>nice work chaps. you&#039;re right of course, Twitter has more to lose than gain by following this path, and I have no idea how they&#039;d monitor it anyways.  Good t see they&#039;ve squashed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice work chaps. you&#39;re right of course, Twitter has more to lose than gain by following this path, and I have no idea how they&#39;d monitor it anyways.  Good t see they&#39;ve squashed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Ooh front page get you! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can see your skepticism about distinguishing between personal and commercial. Where do all these people fit in - bloggers promoting their own stuff, celebrities, character tweets (i.e. Don Draper for Mad Man), marketing brand managers tweeting. And it&#039;s great that they&#039;re thinking about offering more functionality, but I don&#039;t quite see how they can charge fairly for this (i.e. small business tweeter vs. coca cola). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any who, I&#039;m still new to this whole tweeting malarkey. I&#039;m really trying to go with the flow, but some of the self obsessed tweeters and people tweeting their every move is still rather vomy for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh front page get you! </p>
<p>I can see your skepticism about distinguishing between personal and commercial. Where do all these people fit in &#8211; bloggers promoting their own stuff, celebrities, character tweets (i.e. Don Draper for Mad Man), marketing brand managers tweeting. And it&#39;s great that they&#39;re thinking about offering more functionality, but I don&#39;t quite see how they can charge fairly for this (i.e. small business tweeter vs. coca cola). </p>
<p>Any who, I&#39;m still new to this whole tweeting malarkey. I&#39;m really trying to go with the flow, but some of the self obsessed tweeters and people tweeting their every move is still rather vomy for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Nimeh</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nimeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m truly happy about the coverage you&#039;re getting (well-deserved!), but I&#039;m wondering if this isn&#039;t a case of premature publishing. While you call Biz Stone&#039;s post a &quot;clarification&quot; I read it is more of a flat denial, at least for now: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.twitter.com/2009/02/nothing-to-report-just-yet.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.twitter.com/2009/02/nothing-to-repo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But since we&#039;re quoting and re-quoting: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think the real value is in charging companies for display ads. It is a conversation, and brands/products want in on it. Not easy, but relegating them to the sidelines as posters is not a very good option. Access to customer information for marketing, on the other hand, is certain to have tremendous appeal. So, on that, I&#039;d say what got mentioned by @RobinGrant in Fiona&#039;s article is 50% right, and in this business at this early stage, that ain&#039;t bad.  :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter should offer custom templates and other nice things to make things look good ... You know how marketing directors get when it comes to being &quot;on brand&quot; and all. That&#039;ll make &#039;em a ton of $$$.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add-ons and extras, premium and pro is the way to go. Brendan Mitchell commented that a FlickrPro type service would be good. I think that&#039;s certainly worth looking at. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Twitter must offer savvy companies more: Make it easy for smart and innovative companies to create and deliver &quot;command line services&quot; like the unofficial ones from the rail and @myflightinfo ... Tons of utility there which is bound to create brand love and bucks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biz&#039;s post decoded by Boomtown&#039;s Kara Swisher: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090211/boomtown-translates-the-twitter-is-really-serious-folks-about-not-making-memo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090211/boomtown-tr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My post on it here: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2009/02/does-biz-have-bizplan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2009/02/does-biz-ha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rock on, &lt;br&gt;~G~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m truly happy about the coverage you&#39;re getting (well-deserved!), but I&#39;m wondering if this isn&#39;t a case of premature publishing. While you call Biz Stone&#39;s post a &#8220;clarification&#8221; I read it is more of a flat denial, at least for now: <br /><a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/02/nothing-to-report-just-yet.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/02/nothing-to-repo.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.twitter.com/2009/02/nothing-to-repo..</a>.</p>
<p>But since we&#39;re quoting and re-quoting: </p>
<p>I don&#39;t think the real value is in charging companies for display ads. It is a conversation, and brands/products want in on it. Not easy, but relegating them to the sidelines as posters is not a very good option. Access to customer information for marketing, on the other hand, is certain to have tremendous appeal. So, on that, I&#39;d say what got mentioned by @RobinGrant in Fiona&#39;s article is 50% right, and in this business at this early stage, that ain&#39;t bad.  <img src='http://wearesocial.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Twitter should offer custom templates and other nice things to make things look good &#8230; You know how marketing directors get when it comes to being &#8220;on brand&#8221; and all. That&#39;ll make &#39;em a ton of $$$.</p>
<p>Add-ons and extras, premium and pro is the way to go. Brendan Mitchell commented that a FlickrPro type service would be good. I think that&#39;s certainly worth looking at. </p>
<p>But Twitter must offer savvy companies more: Make it easy for smart and innovative companies to create and deliver &#8220;command line services&#8221; like the unofficial ones from the rail and @myflightinfo &#8230; Tons of utility there which is bound to create brand love and bucks.</p>
<p>Biz&#39;s post decoded by Boomtown&#39;s Kara Swisher: <br /><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090211/boomtown-translates-the-twitter-is-really-serious-folks-about-not-making-memo/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090211/boomtown-tr.." rel="nofollow">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090211/boomtown-tr..</a>.</p>
<p>My post on it here: <br /><a href="http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2009/02/does-biz-have-bizplan.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2009/02/does-biz-ha.." rel="nofollow">http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2009/02/does-biz-ha..</a>.</p>
<p>Rock on, <br />~G~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 140Char &#187; On Twitter charging companies&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>140Char &#187; On Twitter charging companies&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-471</guid>
		<description>[...] at We Are Social has a nice write-up of the current situation – as befits a company whose Twitter account has ended up on the front page of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at We Are Social has a nice write-up of the current situation – as befits a company whose Twitter account has ended up on the front page of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Legg</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Legg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-468</guid>
		<description>As a twittaholic, I&#039;m pleased to see that twitter has found a way to generate revenue without charging users for the service. I look forward to seeing what happens in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a twittaholic, I&#39;m pleased to see that twitter has found a way to generate revenue without charging users for the service. I look forward to seeing what happens in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-467</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/Cup_Of_Joe&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div title=&quot;Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/Cup_Of_Joe) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Reading: &quot;On the front page of Marketing today… / we are social&quot; ([link to post])&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - Posted using Chat Catcher </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/Cup_Of_Joe" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div title="Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.whitleymedia/picbg.jpg) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<div title="Cup_Of_Joe (Joe Franz)" style="float:left;margin-left:-70px;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;background:url(http://purl.org/net/spiurl/Cup_Of_Joe) no-repeat top;cursor:hand;">
</div>
<p></a><br />
Reading: &#8220;On the front page of Marketing today… / we are social&#8221; ([link to post])</p>
<p> &#8211; Posted using Chat Catcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlesfrith</title>
		<link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/front-page-marketing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesfrith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearesocial.net/?p=891#comment-464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be frank. I couldn&#039;t give a fig about old media. I&#039;m impressed with your new media though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll be frank. I couldn&#39;t give a fig about old media. I&#39;m impressed with your new media though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
